Home     Xml Feed    Submit Articles     Editor Login Contact us
  RSS Feeds   Add us to favorites
  Make us your home page
CATEGORIES
Advice
Alternative Energy
Anger Management
Apple Iphone
Arts & Entertianment
Attorney Info
Automotive
Autoresponders
Blogging
Business - General
Careers & Jobs
CD Duplication
Celebrity Gossip
Child Care
Cigars
Computer Security & Online Safety
Computers & Internet
Credit Repair
Criminology
Dating & Personals
Diamonds/Jewelry
Diet
Ebay
Economy
Education News
Email Marketing
Entertainment News
Exercise
Ezine Marketing
Finance & Investment
Fishing
Food & Drink
Gardening & Landscaping
Google Adsense
Headline News
Health & Fitness
Home & Family
Home Improvement
Hunting
Infants
Insurance
Internet Marketing
Investments
Ipod Video
Legal
Money
Mortgages
MySpace
Online Business
Other
Outdoor Equipment
Personal Health
Pets & Animals
Podcasting
Politics & Government
Radio
Real Estate
Reference & Education
Relationships
Tantra
Religion & Faith
Remote Control
Retirement Planning
Scams
Self Improvement/motivation
Sitemaps
Social
Sports & Recreation
Sunglasses
Teeth
Top News
Travel & Leisure
Vacations
Various
Video Cameras
Video Games
Video Streaming
Viral Marketing
Web Design
Writing & Speaking
Youtube


Opinions on Possible Regulation of Life Insurers' Use of Genetic Information
 Author: Mike Armstrong
 Website: www.lowcostlifeinsurance.co.uk
 Added: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:28:34 -0600
 Category: Insurance

Printable version | Email | Bookmark

Elected officials, executives of the life insurance industry, academics, consumer advocates, and numerous other individuals have begun searching for an appropriate response to the issue of genetic information and life insurance underwriting. We attempted to identify public opinion about various policy options. The immediate options available to life insurance companies are to acquire relevant genetic information from an applicant's medical record, or to require someone applying for a policy to take a specific genetic test or a battery of tests to determine risk of life threatening disease. To explore beliefs about what the population thinks is appropriate genetic information that an insurance company should be allowed to obtain, we asked:
Now I am going to read some general statements about life insurance and genetic testing and ask whether you agree, disagree, or have no opinion. The first is:
a) Life insurance companies should be allowed to require all applicants to
a genetic test.
b). Life insurance companies should not be allowed to use either the results of genetic tests or other genetic information.

c). Life insurance companies should be able to use genetic information from existing medical records, but they should not be allowed to require applicants to take a genetic test.
The order in which the three parts of the question were asked was rotated. The answer options were agree, no opinion, disagree, and unsure; refusals also were noted.
Most respondents (60.8%) said that life insurance companies should not be permitted to use either the results of genetic tests or other genetic information. Most (53.2 %) said that companies should be able to use genetic information from existing medical records, but they should not be allowed to require applicants to take a genetic test. Only 15.4% agreed with the statement that companies should be allowed to require all applicants to take a genetic test. Whites (12.4%) were least likely to say that companies should be allowed to require applicants to take a genetic test and most likely (55.6%) to say that companies should be allowed to use existing information.
Between 25% and 30% of respondents less than twenty-four and over seventy-five years of age were most likely to approve of required genetic testing. Socioeconomic status characteristics also appear to be important determinants of attitudes. More than 20% of the lowest-income group said that insurance companies ought to be allowed to require applicants to have a genetic test, but only about 8% of the highest-income group had that opinion. Similarly, between 25% and 30% of respondent who did not complete high school approved of life insurance companies requiring genetic tests, compared with less than 10% of respondents who had a college or graduate degree. When it came to using existing genetic information from an applicant's medical record, clear differences of opinion were seen by education, but less clear difference by economic status. Respondents with the least education were least likely to say that companies ought to be allowed to use existing information. In contrast, groups with the highest education were twice as likely to allow companies access to existing information.

What is interesting to note is that the lowest-education group, those with less than an elementary education and who presumably had the least understanding of genetic testing and genetic information and what they can be used for, did not seem to distinguish between the implications of requiring a test and using existing information. However, as education level increased, respondents were more likely to oppose required genetic tests but would permit use of genetic information that might already exist.

We asked individuals if they ever had a genetic test, and those who had not had a genetic test were most likely to oppose allowing life insurance companies to require -,such tests. Although it is not clear what is responsible for this result, it may be that it reflects negative test results or individuals who had declined testing because of possible non-medical uses of the information. It also should be noted that only 8.1 % of respondents reported having had a genetic test.

RSS to JavaScript

View all Mike Armstrong's articles


About the Author:
For more information about Life Insurance and Life Insurance Cover please visit www.lowcostlifeinsurance.co.uk

More Insurance articles

   ARTICLE SEARCH
  
Search our article database!






:- Recent Articles
iPod iPhone 3GS Firmware Download

:- Top Resources

-->
<

Copyright 2010 Articlesofinfo.com. All Rights Reserved.


Powered by: Content Management